Proust Again

I haven't tackled Proust again (for earlier efforts see here and here and here and for my liberation see here). 

In all honesty, I probably never will tackle Proust again. I think I understand now that some authors suit some people and some authors suit other people and there is little explanation for this, beyond the differences in human temperament. 

Proust is extraordinary, but not the kind of extraordinary that interests me. I could enlarge and start to speculate about the rise of narcissism - or at least an unbalanced interest in the self - and his influence, but, since I haven't finished reading him, I could be way off the mark.

The only thing I am certain of is that I am temperamentally unsuited to a man who chose to bang on quite so nauseatingly about hawthorn. 

Nevertheless when I came across a reference to Bernard Pivot and his use of the Proust questionnaire I was intrigued. I can't remember where I first read about it but a quick search of the internet revealed this slavishly adoring article about Proust's own responses to the questionnaire, which was a kind of parlour game in his time (his answer to Question 1. convinces me I will never be able to look at his work without a faint touch of nausea, and his answer to Question 7. reinforces that new conviction) and this.

I think the questionnaire falls under the category of "Quite Fun", which, for me, is more than "A la Recherche du Temps Perdu" will ever do. 

Times Past, Times Future

I loved reading Simon Hoggart. He used to make me laugh. I think this piece by him, published on 15 May 1997 may be educative reading for MPs in the current government, to help them prepare for what is to come at the start of the next parliament.

Hoggart's line about survivors of the Titanic is brilliant:

"Ten minutes before the start, half a dozen Tories were facing the massed, crammed, stuffed and stifled ranks of the government benches. It was as if we'd gatecrashed the annual reunion of Titanic survivors, and they'd invited the iceberg to show there were no hard feelings."

Ingrained Conservatism

In Britain recently there has been a confected show of outrage at the fact that an old club called the Garrick has for many years refused to admit women. When a woman pointed this out in the press, all sorts of portly men in the public eye who have belonged to the club for decades decried the discrimination in unison. In doing so, they demonstrated they were either utter hypocrites or total fools who had never realised the absence of women about the place was due to the club's strict rules. 

Personally I'd be far happier to know my husband was having fun in a club that was entirely male. I wouldn't have to worry that some ambitious high-flying female, realising suddenly that she is 41 and needs a husband fast if she is to achieve the item on her bucket list called having a baby, may be doing her best to prise him from our marriage. 

But I am just irredeemably conservative on all subjects. I realised this once and for all when I saw this item about Morris dancing becoming dominated by women and felt extremely sad. I am a woman - I ought to be pleased my own sex can participate in things previously closed to us, but I'm not. I hate it. 

To show that even I can, if I really try, go against the grain of my hatred of novelty, I will use a newly minted phrase that I loathe so much it almost makes me sick:

"My bad."