Having read this review, I came to this book with high hopes. Boy, what a disappointment it turned out to be. Lady Glenconner cannot write for toffee. She is a person who has had quite a life but her account of it has all the excitement and narrative drive of a telephone directory. Understatement and stiff upper lippery is so pronounced in her character that her verdict on her marriage to a serially unfaithful man who regularly erupted into unspeakable rage and occasionally bought elephants on impulse is merely this:
"Apart from his infidelity and his temper, we got on so well."
But perhaps she didn't know there were other kinds of marriage. After all, as she explains, her:
"sister Carey had trouble with her husband ... after a few years, [he] refused to talk directly to her and instead would talk through his Labrador, saying things like 'Tell her to bring the bloody paper over here'."
Furthermore, Lady Glenconner's father in later life believed his wife and the writer's youngest sister "were Vera Lynn and Gracie Fields. At his insistence, they sang songs like 'The Biggest Aspidistra in the World'." As if this were not enough, Lady Glenconner's "father got into a habit of chatting up women on the train to London and inviting them back to Holkham, where he would take them off on the fire engine, encouraging them to ring the bell.'
The book really brought home to me what an extraordinarily good writer the Duchess of Devonshire was. Describing a similar milieu but provided with far fewer eccentrics, the Duchess was able to produce hilarity from the flimsiest of material. Lady Glenconner has much more exciting substance, but her supreme gift is to render everything banal. Take her account of the demise of an acquaintance called Laura Brand, who was, she explains:
"the rather eccentric sister of Lord Hambleden ... [She] always wore sombreros and was always in the sea. ... Laura drowned [when] she and her husband Micky were in Grenada and she went for a swim. Micky was on the beach when all of a sudden her hat floated past, out to sea."
That is the full extent of that story. We move rapidly on to a party, while the hat and the memory drift away.
But then in Lady Glenconner's social circle it seems very little is required to make someone appear wonderfully entertaining. A ritual of the Queen Mother's involving drinking toasts to people is portrayed as the height of wit but isn't, while one of Princess Margaret's entourage, a man called John Harding was, we are told, always welcome, since "the children adored [him] on account of his ability to tear a telephone directory [not often those get mentioned more than once in a blog post] in half." It does seem to me that that particular party trick would pall quite quickly, but not so far as the Glenconner children were concerned, apparently.
Mind you, some of those children went on to rather grisly ends, so perhaps something in their way of life - possibly the forced gaiety expected when witnessing the wanton destruction of telephone directories - did have long term bad effects. Or perhaps their mother's steadfast refusal to do anything but look on the bright side provoked them. Her tone remains constant even when she tells us how one of her sons would go off to rehab clinics packed "with other members of high society", (who she then lists). When her husband suggests disinheriting the boy, she remarks, utterly inconsequentially, "I didn't know what to think, but could quite see where Colin was coming from."
Just as Lady Glenconner seems unable to differentiate between tragedy and daily life, she appears to have absolutely no idea what is funny and what is boring. Thus she mentions in passing, as if she hadn't even noticed it, that the undertakers she dealt with after her husband's death were called Lazarus Funerals, but devotes a whole paragraph to a story with no punchline at all:
"In the late afternoon we [Lady Glenconner and Princess Margaret] would often go and sit in Basil's Bar, watching the sunset, sceptically waiting for the 'green flash' that is supposed to appear on the horizon just after the sun vanishes. Neither of us believed it, yet we always seemed to be distracted by the thought, pausing our conversation to stare at the view, just in case we saw it. We never did but it became a fun habit."
A fun habit! Elsewhere in her narrative we have Princess Margaret trying to beat grey squirrels to death. Another fun habit? Possibly.
In the end, I even began almost to sympathise with Lady Glenconner's monstrous loony husband. A few hundred pages spent in her dull, dull company was bad enough; if one had to spend a lifetime with her, who knows how angry and irrational one might not become.
I was also taken back by the rather "flat" tone of the book. I ended up getting the impression she had been flattened by life. She said she wrote the book because she was sick of people writing horrible things about Princess Margret, however, she doesn't come off that well either...
ReplyDeleteNo, Margaret doesn’t, you are right, so she failed there too. I plan to read Craig Brown’s book on Margaret, from which I suspect Margaret will emerge even less attractively, but at least I am confident the book itself will not be a flat footed plod. It is charitable of you to think that Lady G’s difficulty is due to lifelong flattening, and perhaps you are right, but the Duchess of D had a pretty rough run of still births & a tricky husband, plus weird upbringing, sisters blowing off bits of their heads, etc, & remained sublimely cheerful & amusing. I don’t mind Lady G being boring in & of herself but having decided to write & flog a book, she might have stopped to think about whether she was a born entertainer
DeleteThe Craig Brown book is hilarious, and no, it's not a good look for Margret. I have a few D of D books waiting to be read, I did notice her humor poked through in the collected Mitford letters. To continue the Mitford theme, Lady G's book reminded me a little of Diana Mosley's autobiography, it should have been a ripping yarn. But it read like a bunch of unpleasant problems skirted and unaware name-dropping.
ReplyDeleteHaven’t read Mosley’s book but that sums up Lady G’s far more succinctly than I did. Wait for Me by the D of D is very good. She was very admirable in many ways
Delete